May 23, 2006

What Drove The Hits To A Google Post

... think instead about how to get a few key people to read what you are blogging - that's what will really bring the traffic. -- Robert Sc*ble

There's been awe-inspiring traffic results from the recent 10 Things You Might Not Know About Google posting (which was in fact written by Philipp Lenssen, as part of a blog swap). For edification, here's some numbers:

Total page views: 97971
Total unique IP addresses: 86827

Number one source: digg.com: 38822 unique IP address visitors (~ 45%)

Bloglines subscribers (main feed): up from 222 to 236

Technorati rank: From about 120 sites linking to 180 sites linking, raising the blog rank from around 15,000 to around 9,000 (!). Maybe I should promote myself to C-lister nowadays, rather than Z-lister.

And lots and lots of blog-spam.

There feels like there's yet another lesson in here (besides the now-tedious fact that I'm wasting my time on unedited-voice essays and censorware/DMCA net activism - contrary to blog evangelism, the little guy does not get heard) . Launch a Google-oriented site? I keep going back and forth on the "business case". Maybe.

Top site referers by unique IP address after the jump below:

digg.com38822
i-am-bored.com16208
unknown10387
reddit.com4393
fark.com3886
del.icio.us2516
smithappens.com1879
popurls.com1729
meneame.net1387
microsiervos.com1333
ueba.com.br1082
madville.com542
zipped.org542
bloglines.com485
j-walkblog.com391
stumbleupon.com357
presurfer.meepzorp.com363
sethf.com335
google.com347
pjorge.com307
totalfark.com314
kenwong.cn264
diggdot.us260
geekissues.org260
elpais.es253
surfplaza.be242
blog.outer-court.com212
netvibes.com208

By Seth Finkelstein | posted in statistics | on May 23, 2006 10:40 AM (Infothought permalink)
Seth Finkelstein's Infothought blog (Wikipedia, Google, censorware, and an inside view of net-politics) - Syndicate site (subscribe, RSS)

Subscribe with Bloglines      Subscribe in NewsGator Online  Google Reader or Homepage

Comments

As expected slashdot zero ?

Posted by: Ian at May 23, 2006 08:27 PM

Ian: Correct. I don't want to read more than is warranted into that, though the problem is I have no way of distinguishing a fair rejection from a malicious rejection (though here I didn't even try to submit it myself).

Posted by: Seth Finkelstein at May 23, 2006 10:24 PM