NSCF Press Release on Communications Decency Act (CDA) Lawsuit
http://www.ncsfreedom.org/news/2005/072605CDARoundOne.htm
Excerpt:
The court agreed that NCSF members and Barbara Nitke are genuinely at risk of prosecution under the CDA and that their speech has in fact been inhibited. According to the decision: "Nitke's fear that the CDA will be enforced against her is actual and well-founded. She has submitted objective evidence to substantiate the claim that she has been deterred from exercising her free-speech rights, and this fear is based on a reasonable interpretation of the CDA... NCSF has submitted objective evidence that one of its member organizations, TES, has been deterred from exercising its free-speech rights and that this deterrence is based on a well- founded fear that the CDA would be enforced against it."
John Wirenius, attorney for the plaintiffs, says, "We are disappointed that the court did not act on the uncontradicted evidence we presented that artists and citizens who are sexual minorities are disproportionately censored by the Government's ability to pick its own forum and standard for obscenity cases. The government brings obscenity cases where it knows it can get convictions."
...
To contribute to the expenses of the CDA lawsuit, go to: www.ncsfreedom.org/donations.htm. Every dollar goes directly to ensuring free speech on the Internet.
By Seth Finkelstein |
posted in nitke-v-ashcroft
|
on July 27, 2005 01:07 PM
(Infothought permalink)