Nitke v. Ashcroft is a Internet censorship case challenging the obscenity provision of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). I'm serving as an expert witness on the topic of the Internet, anonymity, privacy, as it all relates to net censorship. My expert witness report is now available on-line:
Nitke v. Ashcroft : Seth
Finkelstein expert witness report
http://sethf.com/nitke/ashcroft.php
As stated in the Nitke vs. Ashcroft Expert Witness press release:
By Seth Finkelstein | posted in infothought | on May 17, 2004 11:59 PM (Infothought permalink) | FollowupsThe expert witness reports support the plaintiffs' contention that "local community standards" cannot be accurately applied to the Internet and, therefore, cannot be used to determine what is obscene. If the most restrictive communities can control what is placed on the Internet, then everyone will be restricted to that standard. The Internet is a world-wide phenomenon, therefore websites should not be held to standards specific to geo-location because community standards vary significantly from region to region and community to community.