Here's a less gloomy view from an A-lister
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/9/27/44047/1384
I think bloggers with 100 daily visitors are the essence of the blogosphere -- and those guys, collectively, reach a lot more than Daily Kos does. While 100 daily visitors may seem shrimpy, it's pretty darn impressive to build an audience that size. When I hit that milestone, I remember thinking, "Damn, I couldn't even fit that many people in my house!" Now it's seen as a sign of failure, and that's just bullshit.
Cheer up,
Fred
I wonder how RSS services like Bloglines skew readership numbers. I read Infothought almost always via the full text articles available in the RSS feed, so the number of times I actually hit the website is very small.
According to Bloglines, you have 100 subscribers via their service. That may give you 400 per day total...
Posted by hudson at September 27, 2004 08:47 AMFred, thanks, but unfortunately, I find little comfort in those sentiments. It's just being told the little people are the backbone of the country. Well, there's a way in which that's a laudable speech, but there's also a way in which it misses the point. It's basically an injunction to be happy with your station in life no matter how humble. But this connects back to my point about destination vs. journey. If I value the destination, NOT the journey, then I'm not keen to hear "Wherever you go, there you are".
Hudson: Bloglines very usefully gives exact numbers of subscribers via a server log message. I took that into account, see update. While I may find a few extra dozen here or there, I'm not going to find a thousand readers hiding under a rock somewhere.
Posted by Seth Finkelstein at September 27, 2004 10:58 AMReading through your site leaves me feeling depressed that I know no-one with the clout needed to support your work. It is an indictment of the way this world works when someone like you feels unable to do useful work (like your censorware work).
Posted by Simon Farnsworth at September 27, 2004 12:50 PMWould you rather not have 300 readers? (ie. Would you rather not bother with this at all if you aren't getting Freedom-to-tinker traffic?)
Posted by Firas at September 27, 2004 01:14 PMSO LONELY
Posted by Osaka at September 27, 2004 08:04 PMSimon: Thank you for the sentiment at least.
Firas: That's exactly the point. It's always been marginal in terms of the return for effort invested, and, without being melodramatic about it, it's become even less worth it after the last negative turn of events (i.e. Greplaw).
You're up to 101 on Bloglines. Party on, Seth!
More seriously, I'm glad to hear that Bloglines does report the number of subscribers in your log file and that you're able to include it in your subscriber count. I've wondered if users of online RSS aggregators hurt blogad revenue numbers since none of the ads are ever loaded.
Posted by hudson at September 29, 2004 10:30 PMHmmmm. I have like 10-11 readers and I think that's pretty impressive. Actually its even more impressive when I get a comment. Any real back and forth with readers would be worthwhile for me.
Posted by Derek at October 2, 2004 01:53 AMHudson: 102 now! At this rate, I'll be on the A-list ... in several years.
Derek: It's good that it's working for you, for what you want to do. But that doesn't mean it's working for me, for what I want to do.