I'm not sure I understand what you mean here.
Are you saying that it's not good that Lessig has criticised Declan? Or that he doesn't have as much reach as Declan? Or that he's *too* powerful? Or that there's a strong contrast between the impact of your writiing here and Lessig's?
Posted by danny at December 9, 2003 12:20 PMDanny, I think he's saying "Even though Lessig was able to respond to Declan on his blog and correct a misunderstanding, don't extrapolate that it'll work for anyone. Lessig has a very popular blog, unlike almost everyone else."
Posted by Aaron Swartz at December 9, 2003 02:19 PMAaron has it right.
The idea was my trying to get some sort of quantitative handle on "very popular". That is, to mathematically rebut the blog bubble-blowing of the hype that with BLOGS, we have the power to fight back against journalist misrepresentation ...
A very, very, few people have that power - Lessig is literally in the top 100, out of more than a million, there.
Posted by Seth Finkelstein at December 9, 2003 07:50 PM