Oh please, "attack sites which engage in personal attacks on Wikipedia administrators"? It's a shame that even you have bought into the spurious notion that scrutinizing and criticizing the actions of WP admins amounts to "personal attack."

Please, don't damn Wikipedia Review with faint praise. It's the only site that consistently acts as a watchdog on the misdeeds, excesses, and hypocracy of Wikipedia. That WR delivers documented, referenced news should be no surprise.